{"id":"vendor-evaluation","title":"AI vendor evaluation","intended_use":"Prepare an evidence-based evaluation of a public AI vendor claim.","method_ids":["value-proposition","ach","assumptions","premortem"],"questions":["What task and baseline define success?","Which independent result would contradict the claim?","What is the total cost per successful task?","Who stops rollout when a threshold fails?"],"evidence_requirements":["Public claim and date","Representative test set","Baseline results","Error and cost measurements"],"limitations":["This pack organizes an evaluation; it does not evaluate a named vendor for you."],"version":"0.3.0","updated":"2026-09-05","steps":[{"order":1,"method_id":"value-proposition","instruction":"Match an offer to a specific customer job and measurable benefit."},{"order":2,"method_id":"ach","instruction":"Compare plausible explanations without merely confirming a favorite."},{"order":3,"method_id":"assumptions","instruction":"Expose dependencies hidden inside a confident plan."},{"order":4,"method_id":"premortem","instruction":"Find preventable failure before committing to a plan."}],"methods":[{"id":"value-proposition","title":"Value Proposition","version":"0.3.0","updated":"2026-09-05","intended_use":"Match an offer to a specific customer job and measurable benefit.","steps":["Name the job, current alternative, obstacles, and desired outcome.","Map each offered feature to a relevant obstacle or gain.","Remove features that lack a customer purpose.","Observe use and willingness to pay separately."],"questions":["Which task becomes easier or more reliable?","Will the customer pay rather than use the free alternative?"],"evidence_requirements":["Customer-job definition","Observed task outcome","Payment evidence"],"limitations":["Simulated interviews cannot establish willingness to pay."],"sources":[{"title":"Strategyzer, Value Proposition Canvas","url":"https://www.strategyzer.com/library/the-value-proposition-canvas","locator":"Main body","checked":"2026-09-05"}],"provenance":{"form":"Original concise method summary; no reproduced source passages","review":"Operator desk review; not an independent expert certification","reviewed_at":"2026-09-05","rights":"No claim to ownership of the underlying method. Linked sources retain their own terms."},"canonical_url":"https://rasczak-agent-service.rasczak-commons.workers.dev/methods/value-proposition/"},{"id":"ach","title":"Analysis of Competing Hypotheses","version":"0.3.0","updated":"2026-09-05","intended_use":"Compare plausible explanations without merely confirming a favorite.","steps":["List competing explanations before selecting one.","Cross evidence against every explanation, marking inconsistency and unknowns.","Prioritize diagnostic evidence; remove redundant support.","Test sensitivity and record observations that would change the conclusion."],"questions":["What observation would contradict the preferred explanation?","Does this evidence distinguish the alternatives?"],"evidence_requirements":["Hypothesis list","Evidence-source matrix","Disconfirming observation"],"limitations":["Consistency is not proof; missing observations cannot be scored as contrary evidence."],"sources":[{"title":"Heuer, Psychology of Intelligence Analysis","url":"https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Pyschology-of-Intelligence-Analysis.pdf","locator":"Printed pages 95-97, chapter 8","checked":"2026-09-05"}],"provenance":{"form":"Original concise method summary; no reproduced source passages","review":"Operator desk review; not an independent expert certification","reviewed_at":"2026-09-05","rights":"No claim to ownership of the underlying method. Linked sources retain their own terms."},"canonical_url":"https://rasczak-agent-service.rasczak-commons.workers.dev/methods/ach/"},{"id":"assumptions","title":"Key Assumptions Check","version":"0.3.0","updated":"2026-09-05","intended_use":"Expose dependencies hidden inside a confident plan.","steps":["List what must be true for the plan to work.","Separate verified facts, inferences, and unresolved assumptions.","Rank assumptions by consequence if false and weakness of evidence.","Assign a test, owner, review date, and action if false."],"questions":["What are we treating as certain without evidence?","Which failed assumption changes the decision?"],"evidence_requirements":["Assumption register","Source quality","Falsification test"],"limitations":["Confidence labels must describe evidence, not substitute for it."],"sources":[{"title":"CIA, A Tradecraft Primer","url":"https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/955180a45afe3f5013772c313b16face/Tradecraft-Primer-apr09.pdf","locator":"Key Assumptions Check, printed pages 7-9","checked":"2026-09-05"}],"provenance":{"form":"Original concise method summary; no reproduced source passages","review":"Operator desk review; not an independent expert certification","reviewed_at":"2026-09-05","rights":"No claim to ownership of the underlying method. Linked sources retain their own terms."},"canonical_url":"https://rasczak-agent-service.rasczak-commons.workers.dev/methods/assumptions/"},{"id":"premortem","title":"Premortem","version":"0.3.0","updated":"2026-09-05","intended_use":"Find preventable failure before committing to a plan.","steps":["Define the decision, deadline, and measurable failure.","Assume the plan failed; independently list plausible causes.","Rank causes by impact, evidence, and controllability.","Assign prevention, warning indicators, and a stop condition."],"questions":["What failure would surprise the plan owner?","Which warning arrives early enough to act?"],"evidence_requirements":["Failure definition","Risk owner","Observable leading indicator"],"limitations":["Imagined failures are hypotheses, not incident evidence."],"sources":[{"title":"Gary Klein, Premortem","url":"https://www.gary-klein.com/premortem","locator":"Main body","checked":"2026-09-05"}],"provenance":{"form":"Original concise method summary; no reproduced source passages","review":"Operator desk review; not an independent expert certification","reviewed_at":"2026-09-05","rights":"No claim to ownership of the underlying method. Linked sources retain their own terms."},"canonical_url":"https://rasczak-agent-service.rasczak-commons.workers.dev/methods/premortem/"}],"canonical_url":"https://rasczak-agent-service.rasczak-commons.workers.dev/packs/vendor-evaluation/","payment":{"price_usd":"0.01","unit":"one versioned packaged result","knowledge_is_free":true}}